The Playgroundz, streetball, streetball news, videos, moves, interviews, articles, forums, events, Dime, Notic, YPA, SBA, And1, AND1, And 1, AND 1, Hot Sauce, Skip to My Lou, AO, The Professor, Bone Collector, And1 Mixtapes, And1 Mixtape Tour, Main Event, Pat Da Rock, Rucker Park, EBC at Rucker, Entertainer's Basketball Classic, NBA Hoop-It-Up, Vancouver, Toronto, streetball
Home > News > Headache vs. AND 1 - In Court
Sunday, 05 February 2012
 
 
Main Menu
Home
News
Interviews
Videos
Training Programs
AND1 Mixtape Tour
Ball 4 Real Tour
EBC at Rucker Park
Handles
Moves
Hot Sauce Moves
Juggles
Skips
Passes
Freestyle
Information
Search
Links
Graphic Design
Contact us
Most Popular Downloads
Apr.14
Downloads
The Notic: Uncut & Unreleased
17697
Mar.25
Downloads
And1 vs. ATL All-Stars
16861
Mar.25
Downloads
Vancouver HIU - Chad vs. Rory
15734
Mar.25
Downloads
Bone Collector Unlimited
14217
Mar.25
Downloads
NBA Handles Compilation
12334
Login Form
Become a registered member of The Playgroundz and receive exclusive benefits through e-mail. Registration is simple!






Forgotten your password?
No account yet? Create one
Sponsored Links & Updates
Headache vs. AND 1 - In Court PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Saturday, 08 April 2006
ImageJacobs Law Group informs us that Judge Juan Sanchez of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has found in favor of their client, Tim Gittens, known as "Headache" to fans of street-ball, in a lawsuit brought against Headache by AND1, the clothing and footwear manufacturer recently purchased by the makers of AVIA brand sportswear.

According to the law group in an email, AND1 had accused Headache of using their trademarks without permission and further, that Headache has breached a contract with AND1. Judge Sanchez found, after a one-day bench trial, that Headache was not liable, and further awarded costs and attorney fees to Headache.

Matthew Cohen, Chairman of Jacob's Law Group's IP Practice, was obviously delighted with the verdict. "We've asserted all along that Mr. Gittens was the one who was wronged, and not AND1," says Cohen. "We've also always asserted that this suit was nothing but retaliation for a previous suit brought by Mr. Gittens against AND1. Judge Sanchez's decision supports our claims." Information gathered by InsideHoops.com.
No one has commented on this article.
Please login or register to post comments.
J! Reactions • General Site License
Copyright © 2006 S. A. DeCaro
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Top! ThePlaygroundz.net © 2005-'06. | All Rights Reserved.
We have no concurrence with And1, EBC at Rucker, The Notic, Dime, YPA, and/or other (street)basketball establishments around the globe.
Top!